DayforceDecember 2025
ANZ workers see AI skills changing faster than organisational support
Across Australia and New Zealand, 61% of workers said developing AI skills was important, yet only 16% had received AI training in the previous year. Just 19% said their employer offered reskilling for people affected by automation.
Conditions for Capacity™ lensIllustrates the gap between introducing change and creating the practical conditions that help people absorb and integrate it.
Read the original source ↗Safe Work AustraliaMay 2026
Psychosocial harm prevention and recovery
This horizon scan identifies psychological injury as a growing and increasingly complex challenge, often associated with longer time away from work, slower recovery and higher compensation costs.
Conditions for Capacity™ lensA strong Australian risk and governance context for understanding why organisational conditions require early attention.
Read the original source ↗McKinsey & CompanyFebruary 2026
The State of Organizations 2026
Research involving more than 10,000 senior executives examines how technology, economic disruption and changing workforce expectations are reshaping organisations.
Conditions for Capacity™ lensReinforces the need to adapt swiftly while protecting the conditions required for sustained productivity and long-term performance.
Read the original source ↗Microsoft Work Trend IndexMay 2026
Agents, human agency and the opportunity for every organisation
Microsoft reports that individual capability and organisational readiness do not always develop at the same pace as work is redesigned around AI.
Conditions for Capacity™ lensHighlights the need to assess both how people are functioning and whether systems are ready to support new ways of working.
Read the original source ↗GallupApril 2026
State of the Global Workplace 2026
Global employee engagement fell to 20% in 2025, while manager engagement declined more sharply and remains a central concern for organisational performance.
Conditions for Capacity™ lensReinforces the importance of understanding leader capacity as both a performance indicator and an organisational condition.
Read the original source ↗Gartner HR ResearchOctober 2025
Less than half of employees achieved organisational change goals
Gartner found that only 45% of employees reported achieving the change goals set by their organisation.
Conditions for Capacity™ lensSupports a broader assessment of what enables sustainable adoption when employees are navigating multiple demands and initiatives.
Read the original source ↗Microsoft Work Trend IndexJune 2025
Breaking down the infinite workday
Microsoft examines how meetings, messages and work outside conventional hours are fragmenting attention and extending the working day.
Conditions for Capacity™ lensProvides evidence for examining cognitive load, focus, recovery and the systemic conditions affecting performance.
Read the original source ↗Gartner HR ResearchJuly 2025
Only 32% of leaders reported healthy change adoption
Only one in three business leaders surveyed said the last change they led achieved healthy employee adoption.
Conditions for Capacity™ lensSuggests that successful change requires more than communication and implementation activity. The conditions supporting adoption also matter.
Read the original source ↗Gartner HR ResearchJuly 2025
Low trust in change is now widespread
In Gartner's global employee survey, 79% of employees showed low trust in organisational change; organisations experiencing ungovernable change were less likely to sustain high change trust.
Conditions for Capacity™ lensTrust is a condition for adoption. It can erode when the volume, sequencing and governance of change exceed what people and systems can absorb.
Read the original source ↗Safe Work AustraliaCurrent guidance
Psychosocial hazards at work
Safe Work Australia identifies high job demands, low control, poor support and poor organisational change management among recognised psychosocial hazards.
Conditions for Capacity™ lensConnects the management of organisational change with legal duties to identify and control risks to psychological health and safety.
Read the original source ↗